<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nameslave &#187; What&#8217;s New?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nameslave.com/topics/whats-new/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nameslave.com</link>
	<description>Multimedia Minimalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome overtakes Firefox and closing in on Internet Explorer</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/chrome-overtakes-firefox-and-closing-in-on-internet-explorer</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/chrome-overtakes-firefox-and-closing-in-on-internet-explorer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest browser war verdicts are in. #Chrome (by #Google) (25.69%) overtakes #Firefox (25.23%) and closing in on Internet Explorer (40.63%) in November 2011, according to gs.statcounter. This brings back some fond memories, when my once beloved Netscape Navigator fell &#8230; <a href="http://nameslave.com/chrome-overtakes-firefox-and-closing-in-on-internet-explorer">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest browser war verdicts are in. #Chrome (by #Google) (25.69%) overtakes #Firefox (25.23%) and closing in on Internet Explorer (40.63%) in November 2011, according to <a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/press/chrome-overtakes-firefox-globally-for-first-time">gs.statcounter</a>.</p>
<p>This brings back some fond memories, when my once beloved Netscape Navigator fell from heaven to hell in just a few years by Y2K, and I reluctantly started tailoring websites for Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer (even though they did not comply with web standards and were full of holes, at least back then). Not sure if I should be glad or what, but history does repeat itself, and this time around, we witness IE&#8217;s market share shrinking noticeably (from 48.16% a year ago) while Chrome almost doubles up (from 13.35%) and Firefox losing its fire (fell from 31.17%).</p>
<p>But unlike 10 years ago, most browsers these days (or at least their up-to-date versions, unless you are still using IE6) are relatively standards-compliant, and web designers know very well how to make their products cross-browser safe and compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/chrome-overtakes-firefox-and-closing-in-on-internet-explorer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google doodle re: Martha Graham by Ryan Woodward</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/google-doodle-re-martha-graham-by-ryan-woodward</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/google-doodle-re-martha-graham-by-ryan-woodward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 16:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doodle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vimeo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably the best Google doodle EVER, re: Martha Graham&#8216;s 117th birthday, animation (yes, it&#8217;s animated) by Ryan Woodward (whose official website is apparently crashed by this huge spike of traffic).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the best Google doodle EVER, re: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Graham">Martha Graham</a>&#8216;s 117th birthday, animation (yes, it&#8217;s animated) by Ryan Woodward (whose official website is apparently crashed by this huge spike of traffic)</a>.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/23562061" width="500" height="194" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/google-doodle-re-martha-graham-by-ryan-woodward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transit City is over</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/transit-city-is-over</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/transit-city-is-over#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bike City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucerne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retro-futuristic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Thomson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who still don&#8217;t get it (politicians in particular, like when Sarah Thomson talked about her &#8220;Bike City&#8221; as if it was something remotely relevant), Toronto is REALLY fed up (AND the people have already spoken, when they elected &#8230; <a href="http://nameslave.com/transit-city-is-over">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who still don&#8217;t get it (politicians in particular, like when <a href="http://sarahthomson.ca/">Sarah Thomson</a> talked about her &#8220;<a href="http://sarahthomson.ca/blog/sarah-thomsons-bike-city">Bike City</a>&#8221; as if it was something remotely relevant), Toronto is REALLY fed up (AND the people have already spoken, when they elected <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xfsIj6gYAw">Rob Ford</a> on October 25).</p>
<p>To be fair, <a href="http://www.transitcity.ca/">Transit City</a> would be a visionary concept, IF we were living in the 1950s, or for less crowded places like <a href="http://www.ville-nice.fr/">Nice</a> (pronounced as &#8220;niece&#8221;) or <a href="http://www.luzern.ch/">Lucerne</a>. But the cold, hard truth is that, Toronto is home to more than 2.5 MILLION people, and it would be unrealistic to rely on some retro-futuristic street cars to move them around. </p>
<p>Yes, there are budgetary constraints; but instead of writing off any subway expansion as expensive, perhaps we should also look beyond <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1JFR2GVlBM">Yonge and Dundas</a>, and learn from other world-class cities like Shanghai and Delhi, especially when it comes to project financing.</p>
<p>And no, it&#8217;s not even about politics.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RsG1glVxw4s&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RsG1glVxw4s&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/transit-city-is-over/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandbox for WordPress</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/sandbox-for-wordpress</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/sandbox-for-wordpress#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Skelton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Wallick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally decided on using Sandbox (collaboratively by Scott Wallick and Andy Skelton) for WordPress. No, it&#8217;s not my original design, but I just love it how it brings out not only text but also pictures via a minimalist vehicle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally decided on using <a href="http://sndbx.org/">Sandbox</a> (collaboratively by <a href="http://scottwallick.com/">Scott Wallick</a> and <a href="http://andyskelton.com/">Andy Skelton</a>) for <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a>. No, it&#8217;s not my original design, but I just love it how it brings out not only text but also pictures via a minimalist vehicle. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/sandbox-for-wordpress/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pending Re-Launch</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/pending-relaunch</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/pending-relaunch#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nameslave is pending re-launch in November 2010. Yes, it will be a work in progress, with both its content and form (a.k.a. design) undergoing some fine-tuning down the road. Hopefully, it will not be too annoying. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Nameslave" href="http://nameslave.com">Nameslave</a> is pending re-launch in November 2010. Yes, it will be a work in progress, with both its content and form (a.k.a. design) undergoing some fine-tuning down the road. Hopefully, it will not be too annoying. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/pending-relaunch/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Il Fornello Restaurant Review</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/il-fornello-restaurant-review</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/il-fornello-restaurant-review#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Il Fornello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richmond Hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With 10 years of history, 9 locations throughout the GTA, and a decent website (at ilfornello.com), so I thought Il Fornello was a well managed restaurant chain. WRONG! I went to their Richmond Hill location yesterday (Saturday) for their weekend &#8230; <a href="http://nameslave.com/il-fornello-restaurant-review">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 10 years of history, 9 locations throughout the GTA, and a decent website (at ilfornello.com), so I thought Il Fornello was a well managed restaurant chain. WRONG!</p>
<p>I went to their Richmond Hill location yesterday (Saturday) for their weekend buffet brunch. And although their published hours start at 11:30 AM, their door was locked as of 11:35 AM. Fine, it&#8217;s only 5 minutes, so I went to the nearby Chapters/Indigo for a quick browse. Not really that nearby, had to drive a block away. And when I turned around their corners, I could clearly see staffers inside, probably preparing for the opening.</p>
<p>I returned at 11:55 AM, and guess what? The door was still locked! Now you may think they have not updated their hours on their corporate website, and they actually open at noon instead. NO! I called on Friday and specifically asked for their weekend buffet brunch AND confirmed when it started (at 11:30 AM). After all, it&#8217;s BRUNCH, which means <strong>breakfast</strong> + lunch.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have their phone number at hand, so I went back home (fortunately, it&#8217;s only 5 minutes away), and got it from the web. Called them, and was told they were opened A COUPLE OF MINUTES AGO.</p>
<p>Whether I still went there, or if their food is good is not the question here. Their management sucks. I don&#8217;t blame the kitchen staff who were late in preparing the food for the brunch, I won&#8217;t even blame the other waiters who showed up late. It&#8217;s the <strong>MANAGER</strong>&#8216;s fault. HE (or she) should be reprimanded. If a restaurant cannot even open its door for a weekend brunch at noon (i.e. more than half an hour late), they better cancel that for good. And if the corporate head office was not able to maintain a high level of service quality, they should rethink operating at so many locations.</p>
<p>By the way, this is probably NOT an isolated incident, because when I called, there was no apology, and that staffer sounded like it&#8217;s no big deal. ;p </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/il-fornello-restaurant-review/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why people still buy cheap hosting??</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/why-people-still-buy-cheap-hosting</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/why-people-still-buy-cheap-hosting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 20:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disk space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have read stories from people having their website down for well over a week, or the so-called &#8220;host&#8221; (who turns out to be a high school or even elementary school kid) simply vanishes from the face of earth, &#8230; <a href="http://nameslave.com/why-people-still-buy-cheap-hosting">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have read stories from people having their website down for well over a week, or the so-called &#8220;host&#8221; (who turns out to be a high school or even elementary school kid) simply vanishes from the face of earth, but why do people still sign up with them??</p>
<p>Every logical mind KNOWS that it&#8217;s not possible to run a hosting <strong>BUSINESS</strong> (yes, business; unless it&#8217;s some kids earning snacks or flash cards) on a couple of dollars per month <strong>REGARDLESS OF DISK SPACE AND BANDWIDTH</strong>, not to say those who ask for a few dollars per YEAR!! :shocked: Reason? Any reliable host would have to take into consideration SUPPORT. Yes, support, and it costs. For clients, esp. newbies, to submit a ticket (forget about phone calls) every other months, and your few dollars are gone. So how could they survive?? EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT, but my question is: why do people still waste their time and go with those cheap hosting, only to switch everything over in a few months&#8217; time! Just curious. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/why-people-still-buy-cheap-hosting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hemera Image Express</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/hemera-image-express</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/hemera-image-express#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AbleStock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hemera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hemera which once acquired Corel&#8216;s stock image collection and still owns AbleStock sent me 2 e-mail yesterday and today. The first (sent Nov 10) sells their 1-month subscription (of 500,000+ royalty free images) for $9.99 (originally priced at $29.95) as &#8230; <a href="http://nameslave.com/hemera-image-express">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hemera.com/" title="Hemera">Hemera</a> which once acquired <a href="http://www.corel.com/">Corel</a>&#8216;s stock image collection and still owns <a href="http://ablestock.com/">AbleStock</a> sent me 2 e-mail yesterday and today.</p>
<p>The first (sent Nov 10) sells their 1-month subscription (of 500,000+ royalty free images) for $9.99 (originally priced at $29.95) as a limited time offer (good till Nov 12).</p>
<p>Then just now I got a second e-mail, telling me that they have the &#8220;best deal yet&#8221;: for $6.99, you&#8217;ll get the same stuff, and once again, for a limited time (till Nov 15).</p>
<p>I almost fell for the first offer, now should I go for the second, cheaper one? Or will they have a third offer tomorrow, for something like $1.99? LOL! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/hemera-image-express/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google just acquired Picasa</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/google-just-acquired-picasa</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/google-just-acquired-picasa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone tried out the free download of Picasa 1.6 at Google&#8216;s home page? My first impression is that it&#8217;s neat (I LOVE neat things) and therefore much better than those offered by other portals (incl. Yahoo). And remember it&#8217;s FREE! &#8230; <a href="http://nameslave.com/google-just-acquired-picasa">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone tried out the free download of Picasa 1.6 at <a href="http://google.com/ncr">Google</a>&#8216;s home page? My first impression is that it&#8217;s neat (I LOVE neat things) and therefore much better than those offered by other portals (incl. <a href="http://www.yahoo.com/">Yahoo</a>). And remember it&#8217;s FREE!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/intl/et/press/pressrel/picasa.html">http://www.google.com/intl/et/press/pressrel/picasa.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/google-just-acquired-picasa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hostway: what&#8217;s wrong?</title>
		<link>http://nameslave.com/hostway-whats-wrong</link>
		<comments>http://nameslave.com/hostway-whats-wrong#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nameslave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What's New?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nameslave.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got a new website re-design/maintenance deal of which the previous webmaster had it set up at Hostway. I got the user name and password to their sitecontrol.com interface with no problem. But when I want to update the &#8230; <a href="http://nameslave.com/hostway-whats-wrong">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got a new website re-design/maintenance deal of which the previous webmaster had it set up at <a href="http://www.hostway.com/">Hostway</a>. I got the user name and password to their sitecontrol.com interface with no problem. But when I want to update the domain name registration info (there is a typo in the physical address and the Admin Contact e-mail might not work), it turns out that Hostway is NOT up to what they have been paid for.</p>
<p>To start with, I am VERY familiar with domain names. But apparently, the previous webmaster who helped set up my new client&#8217;s website is not: he paid Hostway $52.30 for 2 years of domain registration. And a look at the whois reveals that they are actually reselling OpenSRS/Tucows.</p>
<p>Okay, that&#8217;s fine for me since I am not the one who paid; the problem is: contrary to what&#8217;s mentioned in their generic support e-mail template, I cannot manage or modify my client&#8217;s domain registration info either through their sitecontrol.com interface or by calling their support. Unlike most other OpenSRS/Tucows resellers who give out login combos for clients to manage their domains, Hostway is managing the domain registration for their clients.</p>
<p>So when I ask to update my client&#8217;s e-mail which is listed as the Admin Contact, they just point me to OpenSRS/Tucows. My question is: why are they charging $52.30 for a 2-year registration and does NOT provide any support at all?</p>
<p>Now with the existing Admin Contact e-mail not working, I&#8217;ll have to ask my client to fax OpenSRS/Tucows an authorization on a company letterhead. This takes more than a couple of persons (clerical work, you know) and at least a week to turn around. And Hostway is listing themselves as the Technical Contact &#8230; puh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nameslave.com/hostway-whats-wrong/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

